By Joe Bastardi ~
A quote from Bernie Sanders:
“Sea level rise due to climate change will destroy up to 70 million homes over the next 30 years. Trump thinks that’s good because we’ll ‘have a little more beachfront property.’ He will sacrifice our planet for the profits of fossil fuel executives. We cannot let that happen.”
In 1988, a Washington Post reporter asked James Hansen what a warming Earth would look like in 20 or 40 years in the future. Hansen reportedly looked out a window and said New York City’s “West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water.”
“And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change,” he said.
None of these are even close to being true.
Sanders is lying or ignorant. He has no proof that this will happen None of these people do. No one calls them on it in the mainstream media. The Left knows they have an open field to just say things that are not provable.
Sure as heck can’t tell with the Statue of liberty.
So which is it Lying or Ignorant? He has no way of knowing if that is the case. He just spouts it out.
Why is everyone moving to these places that are going to be underwater? Why would banks bankroll any of these buildings in harm’s way? Sanders, who call it as it is, is a communist, apparently does not understand the capitalist system. would supply the answer to his claim. Its jibberish.
What hypocrites these people are. Obama’s mansion is right in harm’s way. Jeff Bezos, owner of one of the biggest meteo media misinformation merchants, the Washington Post, buying 3 mansions on a man-made barrier island. I would never do that even if I had the money because the history of S. Florida hurricanes says naturally this place should get walloped. In fact, its amazing it’s been 32 years since Andrew went through.
The gloves have to come off with these people Gore, Kerry, Gates, Biden, and a whole slew of them out to destroy any hope of this country being what it could actually be.
Joe Bastardi is a pioneer in extreme weather and long-range forecasting. He is the author of “The Climate Chronicles: Inconvenient Revelations You Won’t Hear From Al Gore — and Others” which you can purchase at the CFACT bookstore. His new book The Weaponization of Weather in the Phony Climate war can be found here. phonyclimatewar.com
Read more excellent articles at CFACT http://www.cfact.org/
Annie Apple
Carl
Dave the Sage
Ditzy Dee
Doc'
Grumpy Old Man
marlin6
mjmotley
Nick Anaxagoras
Aussie
PA Pundits - International
Guest Contributor
patpacer
petervburrows
Joe from PA
Jehanne
spanishbride
steevesna
T Lee Humphrey
T. L. Jenkins
TonyfromOz
Turtle
PA Pundits International 
Nick Anaxagoras
Fri 06/14/2024
Rev 5
“the Inconvenient Skeptic”
John Kehr
Chapters 11 and 12 contain serious errors and misconceptions.
Earth w or wo atmos/GHE/30% albedo: 288 K w – 255 K w/o = 33 C cooler is rubbish.
Nobody agrees 288 K is the GMST plus it was 15 C in 1896.
255 K (240 W/m^2) is the spherical ToA (not surface) equilibrium OLR consequence of a 30% albedo not the result of a GHE.
Without GHG water vapor there is no 30% albedo.
30% albedo = spherical ToA calculated equilibrium OLR of 240 W/m^2 & 255 K.
Lunarific 10% albedo = spherical ToA calculated equilibrium OLR of 308 W/m^2 & 271 K, 16 C warmer.
Black magma covered Earth 0% albedo = spherical ToA calculated equilibrium OLR of 342 W/m^2 & 278 K, 23 C warmer.
396 upwelling LWIR is the theoretical “What if?” BB calculation for a 16 C surface that fills the denominator of the emissivity ratio. (emissivity=radiation from system/radiation from system as BB at temp) This 396 up/333 “back”/duplicate 63 GHE radiative forcing loop is “extra”, not real and has no business even being on the GHE balance graphics.
And, no, it is not measured.
IR instruments do not measure flux directly. They are designed, fabricated and calibrated to deliver a relative, comparative, referenced temperature assuming the target is a black body. If the target is not a BB the operator is advised to paint it or tape it black to mimic such or insert the known emissivity. In the case of the K-T graphic that emissivity is: 0.16 = 63/396. SURFRAD & USCRN also incorrectly assume BB.
There is no such thing as “air flux.” This requires energy flow from cool to warm w/o work violating LoT 2. (page 229 “radiative fluxes” is LoT nonsense!)
This cooling is actually produced by the kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous air molecules. (conduction+convection+advection+latent)
More kinetic action produces cooler temperatures and lower radiation.
Less kinetic action produces warmer temperatures and higher radiation.
Temperature is a function of the kinetic processes, radiation is a function of temperature, radiation is a function (inverse) of the kinetic processes.
The kinetic and radiative heat transfer processes are inversely joined at the hip as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.
https://principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/
There is no GHE, no GHG warming and no CAGW.
LikeLike