Your thoughts, opinions, views of the world are the most important element to posting a Blog.
Writing ability comes with practice.
We can help you with wording and presentation. Email us at papwp@yahoo.com —ed
[IN PROCESS – Please check back]
Email us at papwp@yahoo.com
To start posting now go to this link for your password. No waiting!
You may copy any originating posts in full or part from our site without our prior permission.
But you must credit us “PA Pundits – International” and have a link back to our site and/or the article’s URL on our Blog. https://papundits.wordpress.com/
As a courtesy we ask you to send a quick email when you republish the first time so we can visit your site. papwp@yahoo.com
Thanks
Annie Apple
Carl
Dave the Sage
Ditzy Dee
Doc'
Grumpy Old Man
marlin6
mjmotley
Nick Anaxagoras
Aussie
PA Pundits - International
Guest Contributor
patpacer
Joe from PA
Jehanne
spanishbride
steevesna
T Lee Humphrey
T. L. Jenkins
TonyfromOz
Turtle
PA Pundits International 
nickreality65
Sun 08/01/2021
Greenhouse Theory Goes Kerbluey
1/3: By reflecting away 30% +/- of the incoming solar radiation the albedo, which could not/would not exist without the atmosphere, makes the earth cooler not warmer much like that reflective panel behind a car’s windshield. Remove the atmosphere or GHGs and the albedo goes with it, i.e. no water vapor or clouds, no snow or ice, no vegetation, no oceans, the earth becomes a barren, airless, celestial rock. And much like the Moon having an albedo of 10% with 20% more incoming kJ/h, hot^3 lit side, cold^3 dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly admit this scenario refuting the RGHE/NOAA claim that the naked earth would become an average 255 K/-430 F frozen ball of ice.
2/3: The downwelling “back” radiated energy of the GHG warming loop must first be removed from the terrestrial system. Removing this “extra” energy would short-change & disrupt the balance at ToA so it must be promptly balanced by some kind of “extra” upwelling energy. LoT absolutely, positively, emphatically PROHIBITS “trapped” and/or “extra” energy.
3/3: The “extra” upwelling LWIR comes from an assumption that the Earth’s surface radiates as an ideal black body which, by THEORETICAL definition, with unitary emissivity absorbs ALL and emits ALL.
However, because of the non-radiative heat transfer participation of the contiguous atmospheric molecules, radiation becomes accountable only for (ALL – non radiative) which renders “extra” upwelling LWIR impossible. Emissivity is not 1.0 or .95 but (ALL – non-radiative)/ALL.
In the case of the ubiquitous K-T power flux balance graphic: theoretical ε=63/396=0.16 or per the actual balance ε=63/160=0.39.
There is no “extra” upwelling LWIR, no “extra” energy for the GHGs to “trap” and “back” radiate and no downwelling LWIR. As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.
1/3 or 2/3 or 3/3 = 0 RGHE + 0 GHG warming + 0 CAGW
Nick Schroeder, BSME CU ‘78
Btw a 1.5 C rise in the GMST anomaly over 140 years out of a min/max range of 150 C is a statistical aberration and not a meaningful number let alone a significant warming trend.
For the experiment write up see:
https://principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/
For a YouTube interview covering the three Power Point decks see:
For a copy of the Power Point decks provide contact info.
LikeLiked by 2 people