By David Wojick, Ph.D. ~
The world’s biggest offshore wind array is Hornsea 2, which is 1,386 MW with a turbine size of 8.4 MW. Operational in 2022 it is the state of the OSW art. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_offshore_wind_farms
But Virginia’s phase 1 array is a whopping 2,600 MW, with huge 15 MW turbines. Clearly it is a giant, far bigger than anything that has ever been built. The cost is estimated as $10 billion to build.
Moreover there are a dozen or more comparable giant arrays proposed to be built at the same time, lining the Atlantic coast. Last I heard the combined proposals topped a gigantic 40,000 MW.
From an engineering point of view this is nuts. No one has ever done anything like this so let’s do a hundred billion dollars worth and see how it goes, right? Work up to it? Start small then scale up, learning as we go? None of that.
This giant offshore wind stampede is climate insanity personified.
Virginia’s developer, Dominion Energy, is especially nuts. Most projects have retained experienced European OSW builders as prime contractors. Ørsted for example is the prime for a bunch of projects. Dominion says they themselves will be the prime, with no experience at all. Oh wait, they did build two 6 MW test turbines. So practically no experience, not absolutely none.
From an environmental impact standpoint these giant arrays are far worse. Since nothing like this has ever been built there is no data on their potential impact. It could be extreme, including exterminating the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whale, but who knows?
The federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) had taken this ignorance to absurd heights. They are doing the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for each proposed project. This despite the obvious conflict of interest given their mission is to get these giants built.
Their insane argument is that since we have no impact data there is no reason not to build the damn things. Ignorance is bliss, policy-wise.
I am not making this up. Here is their explicit finding, from the EIA for Empire Wind phase 1, a true giant:
“There is a lack of research regarding the responses of large whale species to extensive networks of new structures due to the novelty of this type of development on the Atlantic OCS. BOEM determined that the overall costs of obtaining the missing information for or addressing these uncertainties are exorbitant, or the means to obtain it are not known.”
In plain English “We know nothing and can’t find out.” Here then is their nutty conclusion:
“Therefore, BOEM does not believe that there is incomplete or unavailable information on marine mammal resources that is essential to a reasoned choice among alternatives.”
The information is not incomplete or unavailable because there isn’t any!
This is just self serving gibberish. There is more than enough information about smaller arrays to see what the likely destructive threats are from the giants. Plus this is another compelling reason to start small and grow, carefully observing the adverse impacts, stopping if necessary.
For example, simple extrapolation from smaller turbines indicates that the underwater noise from these giant arrays is likely to be tremendous. This could have very serious impacts on Right Whales and other critters that communicate acoustically. We have more than enough information to analyze this noise threat.
This nasty environmental issue is discussed at some length in these comments to BOEM, on their draft OSW versus Whales Strategy: https://www.cfact.org/2022/12/05/official-coalition-comments-on-boem-right-whale-offshore-wind-strategy/.
Summary: Rushing to build a big bunch of incredibly expensive giant wind arrays that are far bigger than anything built in the world to date is bad engineering and worse environmental policy.
These are silly giants. BOEM must be stopped.
David Wojick contributes Posts at the CFACT site. He is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy.
Read more excellent articles at CFACT http://www.cfact.org/
Annie Apple
Carl
Dave the Sage
Ditzy Dee
Doc'
Grumpy Old Man
marlin6
mjmotley
Nick Anaxagoras
Aussie
PA Pundits - International
Guest Contributor
patpacer
petervburrows
Joe from PA
Jehanne
spanishbride
steevesna
T Lee Humphrey
T. L. Jenkins
TonyfromOz
Turtle
PA Pundits International 
Brian Catt
Mon 01/09/2023
I find this part revealing as regards environmental activism., as it fits Alex Epsteins 180 science description of all thing’s environmental.
In this case it has created a “Reverse Precautionary Principle” argument.
When they din’t want to do something promising their claim is the Precautionary Principle – “we don’t know whether there will be bad effects, – although we have no evidence there will be, but we don’t like it so must stop it”.
Now we have “”we don’t know whether there will be bad effects, but we like it, so that’s OK”. This uses the exact opposite argument to justify what they want to do. And in this case it’s also false as regards the evidnece.Their insane argument is that since we have no impact data there is no reason not to build the damn things. Ignorance is bliss, policy-wise. Follow the money?
Where there are regressive subsidies to be harvested, everything is great. I am betting there are. Are there?
LikeLiked by 1 person
oldbrew
Mon 01/09/2023
Reblogged this on Tallbloke's Talkshop and commented:
If the North Atlantic Right Whale is a right-thinking whale, it will leave that area and not come back.
LikeLiked by 1 person
boudicaus
Sun 01/08/2023
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
LikeLiked by 1 person