By P.J. Gladnick ~
Sometimes you read something that might make you exclaim, “Just plain… nuts.” Such was probably the case when most normal people saw a column by Joe Mathews published in the Ventura County Star on Thursday, “California should abolish parenthood, in the name of equity.”
If you think the author wrote this from an asylum you would be wrong. In fact, Mathews was employed by the Los Angeles Times for eight years. However, when you read his rantings for “equity” you might think he belongs in some sort of institution.
If California is ever going to achieve true equity, the state must require parents to give away their children.
Today’s Californians often hold up equity — the goal of a just society completely free from bias — as our greatest value. Gov. Gavin Newsom makes decisions through “an equity lens.” Institutions from dance ensembles to tech companies have publicly pledged themselves to equity.
But their promises are no match for the power of parents.
Fathers and mothers with greater wealth and education are more likely to transfer these advantages to their children, compounding privilege over generations. As a result, children of less advantaged parents face an uphill struggle, social mobility has stalled, and democracy has been corrupted. More Californians are abandoning the dream; a recent Public Policy Institute of California poll found declining belief in the notion that you can get ahead through hard work.
And now comes Mathews “solution” that qualifies him for institutionalization.
My solution — making raising your own children illegal — is simple, and while we wait for the legislation to pass, we can act now: the rich and poor should trade kids, and homeowners might swap children with their homeless neighbors.
Now, I recognize that some naysayers will dismiss such a policy as ghastly, even totalitarian. But my proposal is quite modest, a fusion of traditional philosophy and today’s most common political obsessions.
Giving your own children away is “modest?” Perhaps only in the mind of the former Los Angeles Times writer.
My proposal also should be politically unifying, fitting hand-in-glove with the most cherished policies of progressives and Trumpians alike.
The left’s introduction of anti-racism and gender identity in schools faces a bitter backlash from parents. Ending parenthood would end the backlash, helping dismantle white supremacy and outdated gender norms. Democrats also would have the opportunity to build a new pillar of the safety net — a child-raising system called “Foster Care for All.”
Right. Because what better way to end a backlash from parents than taking their kids away from them?
Exit question: Is Joe Mathews auditioning for an MSNBC gig?
P.J. Gladnick is a contributing writer at NewsBusters.
Read more Great Articles at NewsBusters . http://newsbusters.org/
whatyareckon
Thu 01/20/2022
Reblogged this on whatyareckon and commented:
There’s a screw loose with this guy from the Land of Fruit and Nuts!
LikeLiked by 1 person
cognog2
Mon 01/17/2022
Hey! Why give them away? There’s money in those kids so need to be monetised ASAP.
Does this need a sarc. Tag?
LikeLiked by 2 people
TL Winslow
Mon 01/17/2022
I think he stole this idea from Jonathan Swift’s 1729 satire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal.
[[The essay suggests that the impoverished Irish might ease their economic troubles by selling their children as food to rich gentlemen and ladies. This satirical hyperbole mocked heartless attitudes towards the poor, predominantly Irish Catholic (i.e., “Papists”) as well as British policy toward the Irish in general.]]
[[In English writing, the phrase “a modest proposal” is now conventionally an allusion to this style of straight-faced satire.]]
The difference is that in this day when far-leftist nutcases control the White House and California, they’re dead serious and we’re likely to see legislation introduced.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nick Anaxagoras
Mon 01/17/2022
Chicago, Heyjackass.com:
2021 794 shot & killed!!!!!! Every 10 h 22 m.
2021 3,748 shot & wounded!!!!!!!!!!!! Every 1 h 56 m
WTF?!
81.0 % BLACK!!
Chicago, where black lives really do not matter.
Shot by police: 9 dead, 13 wounded. Police shot: 15
I guess not newsworthy enough to foments riots.
If Garfield Park, Austin, Englewood, Humboldt were plantations the Massa would roll through with shot guns and dogs and put an end to that shit – it’s bad for the bottom line.
Maybe Kaepernick, Rahm and Obama could hold a “cease fire” kneeling celebration.
Ballistic vest and helmet recommended.
Blacks are 13% of the population. (census)
Blacks commit 27% of the violent crime (FBI table 43)
Blacks complain they don’t get the justice they deserve.
They’re right.
Black women abort their pregnancies at three times the rate of white women (CDC)
Maybe whites should just gun down each other’s children in random drive by shootings, abort three times as many of their unborn, snort meth and crack and rob several liquor stores a week.
In the name of equity.
LikeLiked by 1 person