Battery Trickery By U.S. Utilities

Posted on Wed 03/06/2019 by

5


By David Wojick, Ph.D. ~

The use of big batteries to partially offset the intermittency of renewables is growing rapidly. Unfortunately some utilities have adopted a deceptive practice with the public, making these battery packs seem much more important then they are. It is all part of hyping the utility’s supposed greenness, which helps their stock price but not their customers.

A recent announcement by the giant Arizona Public Service is a perfect example of this deception. It is a little bit technical, so bear with me. It is all about the difference between megawatts and megawatt hours, which the public (including the average stock analyst) does not understand. APS is trading on this ignorance.

In simple terms, think of a battery as a box of electricity, or “juice.” The megawatt (MW) capacity is how fast you can pour out the juice. The megawatt hour (MWh) capacity is how much juice the box can hold. Which measure is important depends on what you are doing and each has a price.

Here is their clever headline: “APS customers get solar after sunset with major clean-energy projects.

They then go on to tell the wonderful story of how these big batteries will make solar powered juice available at night, for the family that longs for it (as some apparently do).

APS will add battery storage to its existing fleet of solar power plants, build new solar plants with storage, and use storage to deliver cleaner energy to customers at times of peak energy usage. As a result, APS customers will be able to use solar energy even after the sun goes down. Family dinners, prime-time television and bedtime reading lights will all be powered by a cleaner energy mix.”

Finally we get some actual facts: “The initiatives announced today will add 850 megawatts of battery storage and at least 100 megawatts of new solar generation by 2025, for a total of 950 megawatts of new clean-energy technology.”

The trick is that they never tell you how little juice these batteries actually hold, which is very little. The 850 MW is the discharge capacity of the batteries, or how fast you can pour out the juice. The MWh, which is how much juice can be stored, is never given. It is unlikely to be more than 850 MWh and may well be a lot less. This is just a small fraction of what APS customers use in a peak hour, so very little of the juice folks are using will be stored solar. Not even an hour’s worth, much less dinner to bedtime. It might just be a few minutes worth.

They even go so far as to make the batteries look like a generator, which is truly deceptive. They add the battery MW to the solar generator MW, which gives a nonsensical result. This is pure double counting, because the juice in the battery is taken from the generator. In fact it is worse than double counting because what comes out of the battery is less than what went in. That is, using batteries to change the time the juice is used actually reduces the usable amount.

A battery is not a generator; it just stores the output from a generator. An 850 MW coal fired generator can produce that much juice, day in and day out, including nights. Wind and solar generators also produce over much of a year, as long as the wind and sun are right. But a battery just produces until it runs out, which is pretty quickly in this case.

Making a battery look like a generator is purely deceptive and that is just what APS does.

It is also noteworthy that APS never mentions what this big solar juice box is going to cost, which is a lot. According to the U.S. Energy Department, big battery systems like this average about 1.5 million dollars a megawatt. At that rate these big batteries will cost APS customers a whopping 1.3 billion dollars, just so the green among them can think they are eating dinner by solar energy at night, which they are not. Solar after sunset is not cheap, far from it. The cost of actually running all night on solar would be astronomical.

I doubt the average customer will be excited about coughing up this kind of money, just so the greens can feel good. But APS loves it because, as a regulated monopoly, the more money they spend the more guaranteed profit they make. I can see their stock price and executive salaries going up as a result.

Simply put, this is battery trickery.

David Wojick contributes Posts at the CFACT site. He is a journalist and policy analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy.

Read more excellent articles at CFACT  http://www.cfact.org/

Advertisements
5 Responses “Battery Trickery By U.S. Utilities” →
  1. These liars and the so called “Green” organizations are actually a “Den of Thieves”!
    They’re all in it for the money $$$ Not for helping the people as they profess.
    You know both India and China ought to get a real ‘Green Award’ for contributing to the up surge of tree and plant growth!!!
    Yes, you read it right.
    Those 2 countries on their own are contributing to a healthier planet, without Government handouts of taxpayer’s $$$, by producing more Essential Life Giving Oxygen used by us Humans and Animals and Birds and Fish, etc. What a wonderful thing.
    Lesson: In case you didn’t learn this in your Government Indoctrination Schools; Electrical Power Plants burning coal produce CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) which is essential for Vegetation (trees and all other plants)!
    They Vegetation in turn gives off Oxygen! Which we need to exist!
    Isn’t GOD wonderful how HE created all this. Everything works together for the good of our planet.

    Like

    Reply
  2. A good explanation David.

    This confusion between MWs and MWHOURS is rife and goes right up to the top in government and policy makers reports and is consistently being reinforced by dumb journalists in the MSM.
    For instance we have here the US Energy Department giving the cost of a MW of battery energy as some 1.5 million dollars, which is a nonsense statement. How on earth did the Department calculate that figure?
    In fact one could generate one MW for a second relatively cheaply from a spinning disc if you wanted to. Generating this for one hour would be an entirely different matter in terms of cost.
    The costs escalate exponentially with linear increase in the time.

    Back in the real world we all buy our batteries based on the amphour capacity (mah for small batteries) and fork out the cost accordingly.

    Just wish the politicians would go figure and tell the greenblob to get lost.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  3. nickreality65

    Wed 03/06/2019

    A watt is a power unit like a car engine’s horsepower. A watt is not energy but energy expended over time, Btu/h or kJ/h or kWh.

    If you drive that 400 Hp engine at half capacity of 200 Hp for 4 hours you have used 800 Hph which will also use xx mpg of gas energy.

    That battery is like a tank full of gas. How long it will last depends on how heavy your foot.

    If you use electricity at a power level of 10 kW for 24 hours that is 240 kWh of energy.

    On your bill you will see a demand charge for the 10 kW and an energy charge for the 240 kWh.

    You pay for that 400 Hp engine “demand” or capacity (MW) with your car payment.

    You pay for 10 mpg energy consumption (kWh) at the gas pump.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  4. Reblogged this on Climate Collections.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  5. Reblogged this on Micworldwide.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: