Giant Solar Has Virginia In Uproar

Posted on Fri 03/01/2019 by


By Bonner Cohen, Ph.D. ~

What happens when – in the name of combating climate change – gigantic, industrial-sized renewable energy projects are thrust upon unsuspecting rural communities whose residents soon find out that these unsightly monstrosities destroy vegetation and wildlife, pollute rivers, streams and groundwater, and lead to higher electricity prices for families and businesses, as well as lower property values for nearby residents?

Local residents fight back, that’s what.

Spotsylvania County, Virginia lies about halfway between Washington, DC and Richmond. Although the county, located along the busy I-95 corridor, has seen its population grow fourfold since 1980, to about 135,000, its over 400 square miles are still home to picturesque woods, lakes, rivers, streams, Civil War battlefields, and productive farmland.

It is in this world that Utah-based Sustainable Power Group, also known as sPower, wants to construct the largest solar complex east of the Mississippi River and the fifth-largest solar facility in the nation. The other four mega-solar projects are located in the sparsely populated desert Southwest. How gargantuan will Spotsylvania’s facility be? SPower plans to install nearly 2 million solar panels on 3,500 acres of land, or about 5 ½ square miles. All told, the project will encompass 6,350 acres, with some 2,000 set aside for preservation.

How “Green” is the Project?

Thousands of acres of trees have already been cleared to make way for the solar arrays. Like industrial-size wind installations, solar arrays are both land-intensive and intermittent. The Spotsylvania project will require a source of backup energy when the sun doesn’t shine. But battery backup brings its own environmental problems. Batteries degrade over time, and the maintenance and eventual disposal of the thousands of batteries, all laden with toxic chemicals, needed to back up the project’s 1.8 million solar panels raises questions about how “green” the project really is.

Local residents, who have united to form Concerned Citizens of Spotsylvania, are worried about such things as erosion, water usage at the site, toxic materials in the solar panels and the backup batteries, the potential for fires, and how to handle decommission of equipment in the event the project is cancelled. These citizens turned activists, who do not want to see their communities sacrificed on the alter of someone else’s notion of “clean energy,” are pressing county officials to reject the project.

Serving Outside Interests

Little, if any, of the electricity generated at the complex would go to local residents; instead, purchasing the power would be the likes of Apple, Microsoft, Akamai, Etsy, and the University of Richmond. Deep-pocketed tech giants are not just interested in virtue-signaling their solemn commitment to “clean” energy. Many of them have electricity-hungry data centers in nearby Ashburn, Va., the nation’s leading location for data centers serving the Internet. That sPower’s Spotsylvania installation would wreak havoc on local communities and the environment is of little concern to well-connected out-of-state interests.

The 500-megawatt project was approved by Virginia’s State Corporation Commission last August but must still clear addition hurdles, including receiving special use permits from the Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors. SPower hopes to have the facility up and running by mid-2020.

While sPower, the tech companies that would buy the electricity, and the facility’s supporters say the county will benefit from the giant solar power plant, others argue that county tax revenues will actually decline if the project goes forward. Real estate agents in the area are warning that property values could fall from 5 to 20%.

If the tech companies want power for their data centers, there is plenty available at affordable rates. Most electricity in Virginia now comes from natural gas, a baseline fuel source that is reliable, affordable, and not nearly as environmentally and aesthetically disruptive as the proposed solar project.

Bonner R. Cohen, Ph. D. is a senior policy analyst with the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT).

Read more excellent articles at CFACT

One Response “Giant Solar Has Virginia In Uproar” →

  1. nickreality65

    Fri 03/01/2019

    “Without thermal controls, the temperature of the orbiting Space Station’s Sun-facing side would soar to 250 degrees F (121 C), while thermometers on the dark side would plunge to minus 250 degrees F (-157 C). There might be a comfortable spot somewhere in the middle of the station, but searching for it wouldn’t be much fun!”

    Guess what, space is not cold, it’s HOT!!

    Like standing next to a campfire, hot on the fireside, cold on the back side and without the atmosphere’s 0.3 albedo earth gets hotter not colder.

    Without the atmosphere the earth will get 20% to 40% more kJ/h depending on its naked albedo. That means a solar wind 20 to 30 C hotter w/o an atmosphere not 33 C colder. The atmosphere is like that reflective panel behind a car’s windshield.

    Because of the significant (>60%) non-radiative heat transfer processes of the atmospheric molecules the surface of the earth cannot radiate as a black body and there is no “extra” energy for the greenhouse gasses to “trap”/absorb/radiate/“warm” the earth.

    No greenhouse effect, no CO2 warming, no man caused climate change.

    No problem.

    Liked by 1 person


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: