IS THE AGE NOW ‘RACIST’, TOO

Posted on Mon 08/20/2018 by

1


By Andrew Bolt ~

 

The pro-abortion and pro-immigration Age is suddenly worried:  

The study from La Trobe University found that while the ratio of boys and girls born in Victoria was close to natural rates of 105 boys to every 100 girls, there are higher rates of boys born to mothers who have migrated from China and India.

For example, between 1999 and 2015, 8654 mothers born in China had boys at a rate of almost 111 males to every 100 baby girls for their second child, then at a rate of 114 to 100 to for their third or subsequent child.

“We believe that some women may be terminating pregnancies after discovering they are expecting a girl and in other cases are travelling overseas to access non-medical sex selection services through assisted reproduction,” said lead researcher Dr Kristina Edvardsson.

One experienced sonographer, who did not want to be identified, said they believed that medical professions should consider the ethics and accuracy of revealing the sex of a baby at the first-trimester scan, when an “elective termination” could still be performed.

Suddenly The Age accepts that immigration doesn’t just mean importing people, but their cultures.

And isn’t this concern “racist”, by The Age’s standard definition?

There is also one other wilful blindness that has been exposed here. What does any of this matter – unless the thing you are aborting really is a child, after all, and not just a lump of “a woman’s-right-to-choose”?

Andrew Bolt writes for the Herald Sun, DailyDaily Telegraph, and The Advertiser andand runs Australia’s most-read political blog. On week nights he hosts The Bolt Report on Sky News at 7pm and his Macquarie Radio show at 8pm with Steve Price.

Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/

 

Tagged: