REASONS WHY OBAMA WON’T SHOW HIS ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE

Posted on Mon 02/16/2009 by

4


The following is for all you doubters and all you searchers for the Truth. And NO this is NOT political sour grapes, racism, or “tinfoil hat” conspiracy nonsense. This is a search for TRUTH. A search to prove an almost certain a violation of our U.S. Constitution, Article 2.

John McCain was vetted and proved that he was a Natural Born Citizen by producing his authentic Birth Certificate, BUT OBAMA WAS NOT VETTED! Why Not? All BO showed was a computer generated one that only proves he was born alive and somewhere on this Earth. He has fought Tooth-and-Nail, and spent over $800,000, to prevent anyone from seeing his Original Vault Certificate! WHY?

The following article comes from a website of an Immigrant to the United States from the former Soviet Union. She is putting all us Natural Born Citizens to Shame. She is pursuing the TRUTH that the rest of us are too LAZY or APATHETIC or GREEDY to look into.

My Friends, my fellow Bloggers, my fellow Conservatives, if this were 1776, and it depended on you, would we become the Great United States of America or would we now be sniveling, beaten, subjects of Britain?

Please read this with an open mind and allow the Light of Freedom to Burn in your Cold, Dank, Defeated Hearts!

I am NOT condoning violence or overthrowing our Gov’t! I am merely asking you to act in the Spirit of 1776! Get off your LAZY Butts and get INVOLVED! We voted these DEAF, GREEDY, SELF ABSORBED, DEMOGOGUES into office and we can rouse up and VOTE Them OUT! —Ed

THE TWO REASONS WHY OBAMA WILL NEITHER PUBLICLY SPEAK ABOUT WHERE HE WAS BORN NOR PRODUCE HIS ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE

Statements have been made in the public domain that if Obama was not born in Hawaii but rather in Kenya, that he actually committed a crime involving fraud. That leads me to think that if that were true, then Obama has a Constitutional and state common law right to avoid further self-incrimination and to remain silent. That could explain why he has neither talked publicly nor wants to talk in any court of law about where he was born. But his right to remain silent would not extend to withholding his original Certificate of Live Birth. Disclosure of documents is not testimonial (coming from a person’s mouth) and his 5th Amendment and state common law right to remain silent and to not incriminate himself would not prevent such disclosure. This leads me to the main point.

Obama at present finds himself in a trilemma: (1) Does he state publicly that he was born in Hawaii if he knows he was not and thereby “perjure” himself in the court of public opinion should the truth be eventually discovered? If he so swore under oath before Congress or any court of law, it would be actual perjury. (2) Will he produce his original birth certificate which may show and will he tell the public the truth that he was not born in Hawaii but rather Kenya and thereby betray his natural instinct of self-preservation and his life-long ambition to be President of the United States? or (3) Does he remain silent as to where he was born and continue to refuse to release his original birth certificate and thereby earn the contempt of those in the public who believe that he has not convincingly proven that he is a “natural born Citizen” and eligible to be President? I submit that Obama has made the third choice.

The consequences for Obama are the least drastic and he gains the most benefits under the choice involving remaining silent and not producing his original birth certificate which is exactly what he has done to date. There are at least two reasons for this: … 

(1) To date, no court of law has been willing to accept any case challenging his “natural born Citizen” status. The courts have dismissed law suits against him for reasons of jurisdiction, standing, political question, justiciability, and for reasons unknown. These procedural obstacles have allowed him to escape having to defend the underlying merits of the claims against him which would necessarily involve his having to make declarations under oath as part of legal discovery and before the court itself in case of a trial. He will simply continue to pursue this procedural strategy, for being so successful will allow him to maintain his silence and not produce his original birth certificate with the cost to him personally of only having to pay his team of lawyers. This strategy explains why he is willing to spend enormous amounts of his own money and resources for his legal defense (maybe not even his own money if he can make a case that he can use his campaign contributions to meet the costs involved) and cause private individual plaintiffs and public institutions (courts and public entity defendants) to spend theirs with no end in sight. This strategy also provides great impetus to the sales of his past and future books, thereby further filling up his coffers. This strategy also explains why he is not willing to simply spend less than $100.00 and produce his original birth certificate for the benefit of those Americans who want to see it. Lastly, this strategy provides an answer to the question of, assuming that Obama in the end simply produces his original birth certificate which shows he was born in Hawaii, why would Obama risk the public then perceiving him as one who played a dirty little game for the sake of aggrandizing his own image and increasing his profits.

(2) Obama wants (i) people who simply voted for him, (ii) people who are apathetic to the eligibility issue or because of ignorance, fear, or self-ambition refuse to address it; and (iii) people who in good faith believe he is eligible to be President (these categories may overlap), to believe that all the lawsuits and internet chatter questioning his eligibility to be President is political sour grapes, racism, or “tinfoil hat” conspiracy nonsense. These “explanations” for this outcry against him provide great camouflage for his silence and refusal to release his original birth certificate. This strategy limits any contempt backlash to only those who oppose him on the eligibility issue and to no one else, thereby greatly reducing the price associated with the public contempt component.

The benefits Obama gains from stonewalling compared to the price he has to pay for complete disclosure makes the choice to refuse to speak about where he was born and to produce his original birth certificate most attractive for Obama. The stakes are high in this game for the Office of President. Obama has shown that he has the arrogance and audacity to play the game any which way he wants simply to win that Office and greatly profit thereby. The question for many concerned Americans who doubt whether he is eligible to be President is what they can do to get the nation’s political, legal, and social institutions to adequately and honestly investigate and decide whether he is indeed qualified to be President. Obama’s strategy is now preventing these Americans from learning the truth about whether he is eligible to be President. The ball is in the court of those who challenge Him.

© Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Jamesburg, New Jersey

From the original website:

Please visit the new Site of Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

To defend the rights and freedoms that exist for all citizens in the United States

(Emphasis Mine.  —Ed)

The above has given me a greater understanding of why Obama is doing this. It’s not totally that he is acting in a diabolical, mean-spirited, manner to cause angst among our Freedom Loving Patriots, but he is acting like the Crooked, Scheming, Lawyer that he has always been. He figures we Americans don’t have the Ba**s to pursue his violation of our Constitution, or if we do we will soon grow tired of this and go watch Television.

To learn more about what is at stake please read: Cycle of Democracy

Advertisements