Obama, A Black Jimmy “Disastrous” Carter?

Posted on Tue 07/08/2008 by


During the 1970s, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi – who had acceded to the monarchist governmental leadership role present throughout Iran’s history – implemented economic, educational and social reforms. In the midst of these democratic reforms, the Shah and the Iranian people celebrated 2,500 years of Persian Monarchy. Thereafter, the Carter Administration, foolishly wielding a contorted rhetoric of “human rights,” thoughtlessly encouraged the overthrow of the Shah and thereby hastened the arrival of an exiled and obscure cleric, Ayatollah Khomeini, and with him the Islamic Republic of Iran. This decision became one of the worst foreign policy blunders in America’s history.

President Carter’s misguided approach – catering to fundamentalists and communists – to raising human rights in the context of U.S.-Iran relations, led to the Shah’s fall. Iran then became a theocratic totalitarian abyss, whose radical fundamentalists tolerated far more abuse and torture of political prisoners than the Shah ever had, and supported a stream of terrorist acts and causes. The individuals who comprise Iran’s theocracy are now the world’s, as well as the vast majority of the Iranian people’s, greatest enemies.

Now, presidential candidate Barack Obama has said that he is inclined to meet with the internationally controversial Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, at the right time after due preparation and advance work by U.S. diplomats.

This position only reveals the naiveté of Mr. Obama. Contrary to mainstream media views, the President of Iran is virtually powerless. Any candidate for the presidency of Iran must first be vetted by a hard-line group of twelve clerics who are controlled by the un-elected Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei. During the recent election for President of Iran the members of the Guardian Council disqualified over ninety-eight percent of the candidates, including all female candidates and virtually every single reformist.

Hence, although Iran has elections, these elections are simply fodder for the mainstream media, providing straw figures to distract and entrap ingenuous foreign politicians like Barack Obama.

Many of Barack Obama’s national security policies are sideways, backward-looking and re-treaded from the Carter Administration. As examples, Obama supports direct negotiations with the Iranian theocracy, opposes support for pro-Democracy Iranian groups, and advocates open lines of relations with the most corrupt members of this despicable regime. All of this works only to legitimize the dictatorship, both in the eyes of the beleaguered Iranian people and in the eyes of the world, friends and foes alike. if enacted, this would be another very dangerous and short-sighted strategic blunder, and one from which we may never recover.

The signature moves of Obama are meant to be too noble for mere politics, but the team of foreign policy security advisers that his administration looks likely to field is the constellation of advisors and policy staff that will render him just another “high-toned liberal” doomed to failure. The Obama team is composed of a combination of the young and inexperienced, mere repeats of the usual suspects characteristic of the Carter and Clinton administrations, lofted up from the poorly-grounded gray matter of liberal universities and think tanks. The team members may be united by with good intentions; but without appropriate grounding, they are likely on the road to disappointment and failure for America.

Among the few prominent figures are Zbigniew Brzezinski who was President Carter’s National Security Advisor and a veteran of multiple failures in Iran; Lt. General Merrill McPeak, designer of untimely Air Force retrenchment and stillborn change during the Clinton Administration; Gregory Craig, aide to Ted Kennedy and an exuberantly creative Clinton partisan who defended his President at the impeachment; and Susan Rice, the black hole of talk and inaction.

President Bush has consistently reached out to the Iranian people, a nation that Michael Rubin of the American Enterprise Institute dubbed the “most pro-American in the entire region, if not the world,” and Thomas Friedman of the New York Times called “the ultimate red state,” while the un-elected, anti-American government wields a miniscule 15-20% support.

Although we are unsure whether Obama merits to be judged by the company he keeps, his advisors appear to adhere only to the obvious naïve and harmful foreign policy proffered by Jimmy Carter. In Iran, the Carter Administration helped bring down one our greatest allies in the Middle East and it encouraged and abetted modern terrorism, due to its naive understanding of foreign policy, particularly in this part of the world.

The lack of intellectual and moral clarity about global threats, and how America and the freedom-seeking people of Iran and other Middle Eastern nations should respond, will make an Obama administration incapable of acting on the crucial, deeper game.

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Slater Bakhtavar is president and founder of Republican Youth of America, a frequent commentator and respected analyst on foreign policy issues, an attorney with a post-doctoral degree in International law and pursuing his M.B.A.

Read more articles from

[Emphasis mine.  —ed]