PA Pundits – International

"the relentless pursuit of common sense" – A Variety of Opinions From Various Writers – (For the Best View use a Resolution of 1024×768 or higher)

Every Child Left Behind

Posted by Turtle on 07/14/2009

I was a child of the 80’s. I began Kindergarten in 1983. I was excited because I had to take a test just to begin school – counting pennies up to ten, writing my own first and last name. I passed with flying colors and was assigned to a teacher. I those days, kids were divided into classes based on abilities. There were four groups for each grade level, usually labeled with A, B, C, and D. The advanced students were placed in group A, the above average kids in group B, and so on. The children needing extra help were placed in group D, and special needs kids were placed into the special education classroom. The curriculum was adjusted for each group’s general abilities.

I had always been in the A group. In 5th grade, I stopped doing my homework. No particular reason for that, I guess I was just bored, maybe being a bit of a rebel. I made it through most of the school year without doing more than a couple pages of homework. Sure, I got in trouble, but I was an “advanced” kid so I didn’t get in too much trouble. Besides, I wasn’t disrupting class, I just wasn’t doing work after school hours. During the class trip, I was not allowed to go because I hadn’t done enough assignments. I was forced to stay in the 3rd grade classroom (Egad!). Even that didn’t work. One day, I was told to get all my books and follow a teacher out. In the hallway, I was told that my grades had slipped so far that I was being moved into B group. I about died! From that day on, I always did my homework, right up until the end of my senior year.

Along comes “No Child Left Behind,” the brainchild of the Clintons in the 90’s and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001. The Act requires, in a nutshell, public schools to make accommodations for all students, especially “limited English proficient children and migratory children,” among others.  (Get the full text in PDF.) It also sets up the funding for the public schools based on the NCLB score, which is acquired through yearly “standardized testing,” and calls for the integration of special needs children into regular classrooms.

Sounds like a good thing, right? Well not exactly. When I was in school, we took the California Achievement Test (CAT), a nationally normalized test. At some point, Pennsylvania came out with it’s own standardized test, the PSSA. The problem with the PSSA is that it is not nationally normed. This hinders the results because they are not comparable to other states’ testing required by the NCLB. Funding is based on the NCLB scores, so areas with higher concentrations of illegal aliens migratory families will have lower scores, as will areas where there are more needy children with Individual Education Plans (IEP).

Take Hazleton Area School District, for example. The high school is in it’s second year of “corrective action.” This means that the high school has not been meeting the state goal of 56% of the tested students reaching the “proficient” level (only getting 28%). In fact, 31% tested “below basic” and another 18% were “basic.” Hazleton is so overrun with illegal aliens that every year, the school board comes up with some cockamamey scheme to “reduce overcrowding.” Once it was reopening the old “Castle” for elementary students and giving their building to ninth graders. That is still in effect, yet the overcrowding problem still exists. Those same illegal aliens cannot comprehend the basics of English, nor can they score well on the PSSA. In the meantime, the American children are being put on the back burner while the teachers are busy catering to the students who score the worst. It all comes down to the Almighty Dollar.

Then there’s that pesky Constitution that gives the rights of education to the states and not the federal government, but who’s counting?

There is so much wrong with the education system today that it’s hard to even sit here and list everything. The bottom line is that our children are being dumbed down. Whether it’s intentional or not remains to be seen, but I’d have to say that it likely is exactly what was wanted – a nation full of mind slaves who do as they’re told. There’s a reason teachers and their unions hate homeschoolers, and that’s because homeschooled students actually LEARN.

In the public schools, every child is left behind.

3 Responses to “Every Child Left Behind”

  1. jfc126 said

    Have you got a source for blaming NCLB on Clinton?

    “Along comes “No Child Left Behind,” the brainchild of the Clintons in the 90’s and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001.”

    Because what I found was this:
    Legislative history
    The legislation was proposed by the President (Bush) on January 23, 2001. It was coauthored by Representatives John Boehner (R-OH) and George Miller (D-CA) and Senators Judd Gregg (R-NH) and Ted Kennedy (D-MA), and signed by President Bush.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Child_Left_Behind_Act#Legislative_history

    And how about this one:
    “The Act requires, in a nutshell, public schools to make accommodations for all students, especially “limited English proficient children and migratory children,” among others.”

    Is there actually emphasis in the Act (”especially”) on those children, or is that your opinion?

    If you don’t have sources for these things, I’d be lead to think this entire post is meant to fuel hatred toward democrats and illegal aliens.

    As the avid reader that you are, I’m sure you can find and post your sources easily enough.

    Wiki is not a reliable source, as anyone can edit it. I remember NCLB being discussed in the late 90’s into 2000, when I lived in Florida. The CLINTONS were in charge then. I thought it was common knowledge that the Clintons came up with the whole NCLB. It was also coupled in discussions with Hil’s “It Takes a Village” as a sort of promotion for the Act.
    As the word “especially” was NOT in quotes in my original posting, it would be my opinion. There IS a link there to the actual wording of the law. The parts that are in quotes would be taken from that link. Keep in mind, this is an opinion political blog, and mostly right-wing at that. It should be no shock that we are against libtards.
    “This is an obscure story we’ve been following since it came out in 1996, and little has been made public. On January 10th of that year, New York state’s then Attorney General Dennis Vacco (a Republican) announced he was investigating $100,000 in payments to Hillary or the Rose Law Firm from the National Center on Education and the Economy, a charity that was in Rochester New York and has since moved to Washington, D.C. The organization is a prime advocate of standards-based education, which has been promoted by both the Clinton and Bush II administrations (in the No Child Left Behind act.)” Hillary Clinton – The Dark Side
    ~Turtle

  2. jfc126 said

    Thanks for the clarifications.

    I find it disturbing that you have no problem pointing out the “flaws” of Wikipedia, at the same time as you revel in the fact that this is an OPINION political blog, where nothing is fact checked and there is no accountability. Wikipedia is fact checked, and they would edit false information or lies. Seems like more credible information than can be found here.

    Libtards? Classy.

    Nothing fact checked! Puhleeeze!

    Tony

    Wiki claims to be a credible source. I myself have an account in Wiki and I am able to edit there. Since you think I do not fact-check, it stands to reason that if I edit Wiki, that Wiki does not fact-check either.
    Anyway, PA Pundits is all volunteer, and every one of us researches and investigates our articles. In some cases, like the CRA one, we go further and continue to research long after an article is posted, which is how I found that the requirements were from a Clinton Executive Order rather than the text of the CRA itself.
    I know libtards is a classy word. Thanks for noticing. ~Turtle

  3. jfc126 said

    “Anyway, PA Pundits is all volunteer, and every one of us researches and investigates our articles”

    That’s the problem. Your fact checking is not verified by someone else. If you post something to Wiki, it IS verified by someone else (or it is noted that it has not yet been verified).

    You did not find “requirements” (to give loans to unqualified people) in that Clinton Executive Order. You found mention of sanctions against those who do not comply with fair housing requirements. These are two different things.

    You can believe Wiki is a better source than us – that’s your right. BTW, might I mention that Wiki identifies Shenandoah, PA as the birthplace of Tom Cruise, which is in fact, WRONG. He was born in Syracuse, NY. So much for fact-checking there. They recently changed it and deleted the reference to Cruise, but it was there for well over a year before it was finally removed.
    As for the “requirements” you need to put it all together and read between the lines. ~Turtle

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.